Comments on: Involve money to kill SPAM? http://www.tradebit.com/channels/software/110374/involve-money-to-kill-spam/ Publications about popular requests and topics on tradebit Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:53:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: tudmax http://www.tradebit.com/channels/software/110374/involve-money-to-kill-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-5829 tudmax Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:45:15 +0000 http://www.tradebit.com/channels/software/110374/involve-money-to-kill-spam/#comment-5829 only 1 way to kill spam: kill offending website, charge owner for time lost [at business rate or $30 to $1,000 per hour] and confiscate everything they own, clean out their bank accounts, drop them in middle of desert with no water in hot season ,, no more spam and might replenish desert Senior Network Security Analyst / coder since 1981 only 1 way to kill spam:
kill offending website, charge owner for time lost [at business rate or $30 to $1,000 per hour] and confiscate everything they own, clean out their bank accounts, drop them in middle of desert with no water in hot season ,, no more spam and might replenish desert

Senior Network Security Analyst / coder since 1981

]]> By: Jocelyn Jensen http://www.tradebit.com/channels/software/110374/involve-money-to-kill-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Jocelyn Jensen Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:14:54 +0000 http://www.tradebit.com/channels/software/110374/involve-money-to-kill-spam/#comment-10 Considering that a lot of so-called SPAM is the fault of Internet affilliate programs that encourage the members to use autoresponders and harvesting software while also telling them that SPAMMING is prohibited, (mixed message if I ever saw one) and what cannot be chalked up to this source, can be placed at the doorstep of the little check boxes one usually has to tick a few of simply to join most free membership sites...(and guess what those little opt-in tickboxes are tied to? If you guessed the affilliate autoresponders, you scored 100) I now wonder if 98% of what the modern Internet user considers junk email, is actually the user's own fault? If you volunteer by stating interest, (and there is a bit of fine print telling you that you are opting in to a mailing list by doing this as a rule) then legally you are not being SPAMMED. Some sites are now beginning to threaten lawsuit filings on users who opt-in then report such sites as sending them SPAM. Just looking ahead to the future here... Jocelyn (HSUK) Considering that a lot of so-called SPAM is the fault of Internet affilliate programs that encourage the members to use autoresponders and harvesting software while also telling them that SPAMMING is prohibited, (mixed message if I ever saw one) and what cannot be chalked up to this source, can be placed at the doorstep of the little check boxes one usually has to tick a few of simply to join most free membership sites…(and guess what those little opt-in tickboxes are tied to? If you guessed the affilliate autoresponders, you scored 100) I now wonder if 98% of what the modern Internet user considers junk email, is actually the user’s own fault?

If you volunteer by stating interest, (and there is a bit of fine print telling you that you are opting in to a mailing list by doing this as a rule) then legally you are not being SPAMMED. Some sites are now beginning to threaten lawsuit filings on users who opt-in then report such sites as sending them SPAM.

Just looking ahead to the future here…

Jocelyn (HSUK)

]]>